Resolvix C2

Continuity under disruption.
Trust under degradation.

Preserving mission-message continuity and trust when communications, positioning, video, relay state and operator visibility degrade.

  • HOLDFASTkeeps the message alive.
  • HOLDFAST Sentryestimates communications-state uncertainty.
  • AURM-NETdecides whether the delivered message should be trusted.

Simulation-backed · Validation-led · Built to integrate with existing radios, networks, C2 and autonomy systems.

NODE · TRUSTEDTRUST HUBNODE · TRUSTEDNODE · DEGRADEDNODE · DENIEDTRUSTED LINKDEGRADEDDENIED
The Problem

Modern autonomous systems do not only fail when links are lost.

They can continue operating on messages that are authenticated but stale, delivered but context-invalid, relayed but custody-ambiguous, or technically valid but unsafe under the current mission state.

Resolvix addresses this gap through three connected capabilities.

The Core Principle

Three layers, three different questions.

Routing moves packets. Cryptography verifies authenticity. Neither proves that a mission message is fresh, custody-consistent, context-valid or safe to act on.

Transport

Routing moves packets.

Security

Cryptography verifies authenticity.

Resolvix

Is this message still fresh, custody-consistent, context-valid and safe to trust?

Products

Three connected capabilities.

HOLDFAST keeps the message alive. HOLDFAST Sentry estimates how uncertain the degraded communications state is. AURM-NET decides whether the delivered message should still be trusted. POSEIDON validates the architecture under maritime degradation patterns.

Product

HOLDFAST

Mission-message continuity · Core · Adapt · Sentry

A resilient mission-message continuity layer. Designed to preserve critical command, telemetry, custody and mission-evidence traffic over degraded bearers, mesh networks, relays and intermittent links. Includes HOLDFAST Sentry for receiver-visible severity and uncertainty estimation.

Explore HOLDFAST

Product

AURM-NET

Mission-context assurance

Assesses whether commands, telemetry, custody transitions, PNT state, video state, RF confidence and autonomy state remain trustworthy under degraded conditions. AURM-NET does not improve delivery — it improves trust assessment.

Explore AURM-NET

Product

POSEIDON

Maritime assurance scenario suite

A maritime simulation and validation environment for testing HOLDFAST and AURM-NET under degraded RF, C2, PNT, relay, distributed ISR and autonomy conditions. Not a weapon system or strike platform.

Explore POSEIDON
Separation of Concerns

Delivery, uncertainty and trust are different problems.

Delivery & continuity

HOLDFAST

Improves message delivery and continuity over degraded bearers.

Severity & uncertainty

Sentry

Estimates receiver-visible severity, uncertainty and evidence quality.

Trust correctness

AURM

Improves trust correctness, review signalling and false-trust prevention.

Claim Boundary

AURM does not improve packet delivery rate. In full-stack simulation, HOLDFAST Core + Adapt and HOLDFAST Core + Adapt + Sentry + AURM produced the same mean C2 PDR — by design. AURM's contribution is trust assessment, not packet delivery. View the evidence.
Scope

What we do. What we do not do.

What we do

  • Preserve mission-message continuity
  • Assess receiver-visible degradation uncertainty
  • Evaluate command freshness and custody continuity
  • Assess PNT, video, telemetry and autonomy-state confidence
  • Produce operator-facing assurance evidence
  • Support bounded mission decisions by authorised systems

What we do not do

  • Replace radios or waveforms
  • Control RF systems
  • Classify real jammers
  • Fly the drone
  • Issue commands
  • Control weapons
  • Make autonomous targeting decisions
  • Claim field, anti-jam or anti-spoof validation before hardware evidence exists
Operational Domains

Designed for distributed systems under contested conditions.

Domain

Uncrewed aerial systems

Domain

Maritime autonomous systems

Domain

Distributed ISR

Domain

Airborne relay and C2

Domain

Expeditionary tactical networks

Domain

Sovereign critical infrastructure

Domain

Contested logistics

Domain

Edge autonomy

Validation Path

From simulation evidence to hardware validation.

Resolvix currently presents a simulation-backed architectural prototype with 50 km degraded drone mission evidence. The next technical gate is M1: live RF/GNSS ingestion, SDR or radio-adjacent evidence, hardware-in-the-loop replay, constrained-node performance, and partner-informed validation.

Advisory Board

We are seeking advisers.

Resolvix is forming an advisory board focused on validation credibility — not prestige. We are seeking senior defence, intelligence, maritime, autonomy, RF/GNSS and assurance practitioners willing to challenge our evidence pathway in writing, in person, and on the record where appropriate.

Request a confidential briefing.

Resolvix welcomes discussions with defence, government research, trusted industrial and investment partners working on degraded command, autonomous-system resilience, tactical communications, contested PNT and mission assurance.